12GAUGE
18-11-2009, 02:08 PM
AoA Everybody
I was having a conversation with Moeen Bhai and noticed how much he stressed/liked/preferred handguns that have integrated (and polished) feed ramps for reliable feeding of ammo. The discussion mainly revolved around hollow points and reliability issues associated with them. which can be anything from feeding to reliable/stated expansion.
I was having a conversation with Moeen Bhai and noticed how much he stressed/liked/preferred handguns that have integrated (and polished) feed ramps for reliable feeding of ammo. The discussion mainly revolved around hollow points and reliability issues associated with them. which can be anything from feeding to reliable/stated expansion.
after the discussion, I thought why not check the feed ramp of my CF98 cause some users have complained that hollow points do not feed reliably in them. when I looked at the barrel I noticed that a feed ramp is there but upon closer look I noticed that the feed ramp is not integrated and it not part the barrel. the feed ramp is sorta like built into the connection seat (description as per manual, otherwise called rotating lock). I could clearly see that this type of setup would definately cause some sort of resistance to HP rounds as they are not fully rounded from the tip. any edged bullet would definately get some sort of resistance as the bullet has to ride up the feed ramp and hop over the empty space then into the seperate barrel. if the feed ramp would be integrated it would definately be a one smooth (fluid) motion. but then again, in a rotating lock mechanism u just cant have an integrated feed ramp. so I took the gun apart and placed a HP bullet (courtesy of Dr. Zakir) on the feed ramp (mimicking a round feed) and slowly started pushing it towards the barrel. guess what? I clearly felt resistance as the sharp angle of the HP round would get sorta stuck in the space between the feed ramp and barrel.
went to a friend of mine who also own a CF98 and same thing happened in his gun as well. I guess that settles the argument that only my CF98 is incompatible with HP rounds.
now, after all this I thought of stoeger and upon seeing its pictures on internet I believe that a stoeger would also be incompatible with HP rounds as it also has a very similar design and feed ramp is also not integrated into the barrel. its feed ramp is also built into the rotating lock. the images clearly showed same space between the feed ramp and the barrel. I'm assuming that since everything from the design point looks the same I guess it would also pose similar reliability issues with HP. however stoeger owners/users can confirm on that.
now comming to the main point. what can we do to solve this issue. i'm thinking highly polishing the feed ramp to improve feeding. i'll get back with results as soon as I get that donw. but i'm also thinking that there is nothing I can do with the two piece feed ramp and barrel design. so i'm kinda out of ideas there. HELP ANYONE?
Regards.
I was having a conversation with Moeen Bhai and noticed how much he stressed/liked/preferred handguns that have integrated (and polished) feed ramps for reliable feeding of ammo. The discussion mainly revolved around hollow points and reliability issues associated with them. which can be anything from feeding to reliable/stated expansion.
I was having a conversation with Moeen Bhai and noticed how much he stressed/liked/preferred handguns that have integrated (and polished) feed ramps for reliable feeding of ammo. The discussion mainly revolved around hollow points and reliability issues associated with them. which can be anything from feeding to reliable/stated expansion.
after the discussion, I thought why not check the feed ramp of my CF98 cause some users have complained that hollow points do not feed reliably in them. when I looked at the barrel I noticed that a feed ramp is there but upon closer look I noticed that the feed ramp is not integrated and it not part the barrel. the feed ramp is sorta like built into the connection seat (description as per manual, otherwise called rotating lock). I could clearly see that this type of setup would definately cause some sort of resistance to HP rounds as they are not fully rounded from the tip. any edged bullet would definately get some sort of resistance as the bullet has to ride up the feed ramp and hop over the empty space then into the seperate barrel. if the feed ramp would be integrated it would definately be a one smooth (fluid) motion. but then again, in a rotating lock mechanism u just cant have an integrated feed ramp. so I took the gun apart and placed a HP bullet (courtesy of Dr. Zakir) on the feed ramp (mimicking a round feed) and slowly started pushing it towards the barrel. guess what? I clearly felt resistance as the sharp angle of the HP round would get sorta stuck in the space between the feed ramp and barrel.
went to a friend of mine who also own a CF98 and same thing happened in his gun as well. I guess that settles the argument that only my CF98 is incompatible with HP rounds.
now, after all this I thought of stoeger and upon seeing its pictures on internet I believe that a stoeger would also be incompatible with HP rounds as it also has a very similar design and feed ramp is also not integrated into the barrel. its feed ramp is also built into the rotating lock. the images clearly showed same space between the feed ramp and the barrel. I'm assuming that since everything from the design point looks the same I guess it would also pose similar reliability issues with HP. however stoeger owners/users can confirm on that.
now comming to the main point. what can we do to solve this issue. i'm thinking highly polishing the feed ramp to improve feeding. i'll get back with results as soon as I get that donw. but i'm also thinking that there is nothing I can do with the two piece feed ramp and barrel design. so i'm kinda out of ideas there. HELP ANYONE?
Regards.